Solution for a problem in the contraction Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Solution for a problem in the contraction - Essay Example All the same, the contract with the city managers was exclusively related to loans and the terms agreed had no mention of leases. As such, Wasserman’s lease deal was very attractive and promised Davenport huge profits. Therefore, leasing the property to Wasserman, who could then sublease to the tenants did not violate the terms of agreement; the immediate usage of the property would continue as agreed. Thus, Davenport would be right in leasing the property to Wasserman while at the same time respecting the loan terms not to change the usage or ownership of the property within the stipulated period. All the same, Davenport faces some unethical dilemma. Any contractual deal has to be in good faith and to the best interests of the two parties involved (Hellman 2011). As such, any change or implied change in terms of agreement breaches this good will and partially changes the terms of the investment in question. In the case above, though the agreement with the city managers did not address the issue of leases, leasing the property to Wasserman with the promise of the latter buying the property afterwards amounted to forfeiting the ownership of the property to the second owner, while at the same time pretending that the terms of the agreement were still intact, to benefit unethically from the mortgage waiver. Therefore, in the above deal, though Davenport was legally correct, there were some ethical issues involved in the deal with Wassermann. Helman, Christopher. Chesapeake Energy: Whats Up With These Lawsuits? Forbes. Jan 11, 2011. http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2011/01/21/chesapeake-energy-whats-up-with-these-lawsuits/ March 19,

Miu Miu Advertising and Marketing Technique Essay

Miu Miu Advertising and Marketing Technique - Essay Example In 1998 she opened Miu Miu's first North American boutique, in Los Angeles. Miu Miu was in fact an addition onto the original Prada line, and was introduced in 1992 as a lower-priced line aimed at a younger audience. "The Miu Miu line, which shares Miuccia Prada's nickname, emphasizes earthy colors and a less haute couture look, evoking an overall more bohemian style." ("Wikpedia", 2006). Miu Miu is considered to be the youngest and most dynamic line by Prada. It is known for being a much more fun and innovative label and its womenswear is always lovely, making desirable clothes rarely seen before. In its advertising campaigns, waif-like models are used in 'home photo' poses, in order to add onto this bohemian style. And so, named after its creator's nickname, Miu Miu was introduced as "anti-fashion fashion". The label has a habit of globe-trotting and moved its show to the United States for three seasons starting in 1994. It was in fact one of the first of a number of secondary Italian lines to hop over to New York Fashion Week. In 1997, Miu Miu showed in London for one season before returning again to Milan. Headquartered in Italy with another location in New York, they have a wide range of clothing and accessories, including everything from slide sandals to trendy flowered skirts and dresses. Miu Miu is considered to be an "accessory-strong brand", who has carved out a significantly separate identity from the main Prada line by associating itself with emerging actors, artists and musicians. Indie stars such as Ludivine Sagnier and Selma Blair have populated its advertisements, and Miu Miu's forthcoming spring campaign is said to be featuring stars such as Kim Basinger and Camilla Belle. Miu Miu strives to advertise and reach their customers through many different forums, including retail outlets, television, magazines, and online. The reason for this is to allow as many potential customers as possible. Although their main consumer target focus is the younger women demographic (20-30), their designs can be worn by women of basically all ages. The clothes are stylish and dressy while still remaining classy and conservative. This assists a great deal in their marketing strategy, in that a larger group of women fall into the 'wearable' category than many other designer brands. Many times a brand will focus strongly on a specific age group, whereas Miu Miu seems to have more freedom of choice in that area. Miu Miu's look is rather upscale, and they use high quality materials to design each piece of clothing. They continuously purposely aim to primarily sell their clothing lines in high-end designer stores, in order to retain the idea of quality. Their designs are sold alongside other famously known designers such as Dolce & Gabbana, Roberto Cavalli, and Versace. Miuccia Prada likes to use a lot of crunchy polyester, parachute nylon, and other synthetic fabrics. As for colors, the Miu Miu line tends to have many different tones of green, browns, white, cream, and black. In her most recent line of Spring/Summer 2006, the Miu

Summary Of The Story Of An Hour English Literature Essay

Summary Of The Story Of An Hour English Literature Essay The story is about a woman known as Mrs. Mallard and she had problems with her heart. Her husband was involved in an accident and because of her condition good means of letting her know of this were to be used. It was her sister who brought the news to her and also a friend to the husband who happened to be in the newspaper office when they got the news that Brendly Mallards was in the list of those who had died from the road accident. Her sister named Josephine broke the news to her. When she was told the story she was shocked and she wept as her sister held her on her arms and in a short while she abandoned her sister. After receiving this news she went in her room alone and she did not want to have anybody follow her. Inside her room she stood facing outside through the window that she had opened seated in a roomy chair which was comfortable. She felt that she could now be satisfied physically and from the way she looked she had attained the desires of her soul. She peeped through the window and saw the tops of the trees which were outside her house which all seemed to a have a new life beginning. There was a delicious breath from the rain. There was also a cry that she could hear which was coming from a peddler. She hears the notes from her house. When she looked at the sky it showed some patches of blue sky which were concentrated in one place and they had piled on top of each other on the western side of her window. She sat with her head leaning on the cushion of chair quietly but time to time she could be shaken by a sob which came up in to her throat. She behaved like a child who has been crying before he goes to sleep because he continues to sob even in his dreams. She was young, her face was calm and fair and she seemed to have strength in her. However the stare which was on her face was dull and her stare was fixed at one of the patches on the sky. The glance did not seem like she was reflecting something but rather she seemed to be having an intelligent thought. Something was to happen to her and she waited it in fear. She did not know what was coming to her and it was elusive to name but she could feel it moving from the sky towards her passing through the sounds, scents and colour which filled the air. Severally her bosom could rise and fall and now she began to be aware of what was to posses her and she tried her best to fight against it even though her two white slender hands were powerless. There was a little whisper from her lips which she repeated several times Free Free Free. She then seemed to be relaxed with her heart beating faster. She was full of joy and she did not want to think of the source of this joy. She imagined that the other time that she will cry is the time she will see kind and tender hands folded of her husband, and the face of her husband which according to her she had never loved. But beyond these moments of bitterness she could see many years which will belong to her and she was eager on the arrival of such moments. She was eagerly waiting for that time to come when she will be in a position to feel free and enjoy herself. She wished the time could be now and welcomed it. (Gilman and Golden 37) During that time she will live for nobody but her self. She will be free and no body will impose any rule on her like it has always been the case when two people get married. The woman is supposed to be under the man and obey what the main as the head demands of her. As for her no body will be on her way to tell her to do this or that. She was now free both in her soul and the body. Her sister kneeled from the outside of the door begging her to open the door and telling her that if she continued like that she could even make herself ill. She told her sister to go away and that she was not making her self ill, instead she was she was drinking in a luxurious manner inside the house. She was wishing that the spring days, summer days, and all other days that belonged to her would draw nearer. She prayed that she will lead a long life. She opened the door for her sister she held her sister by the waist and they came down the stares. At that time Richard was standing at the bottom waiting for them. Brently Mallard opened the door and entered from some journey. He was carrying a grip-sack and an umbrella. Mallard was very far away from the scene of the accident and he did not even know that an accident had taken place. He was amazed why Josephine was crying. Her wife was shocked and she died. When the doctor came they told him that she died as a result of heart disease .The joy that she experienced led to her death. The story presents a negative view of marriage. This comes clearly when the woman is very happy when she receives the news that her husband is dead. She is very happy that her husband has left her with enough freedom and she will lead a happy life where she will enjoy herself. Louise did not have love for her husband. Married couples should be joined by love in them and this is required in all marriages. This portrays marriage negatively in the sense that some people may be joined to their spouses not because they love them but because of their own motif gains. The marriage between these spouses was not based on love. Therefore the text portrays marriage negatively. At the end of the story she died because of heart disease which according to the doctors was as a result of happiness when she saw her husband. The disease symbolizes a disease of marriage. She could never be free unless her husband out of her life. The fact that the disease affected the heart shows that the problem in he r marriage originates from her and not from outside. The husband loved her but she did not love him in the same way that he loved her. According to the story she loved him only sometimes. Louise did not have strong feelings for her husband and that is why she is happy of his death so as to get rid of her. The story reveals the status of Mallard. We can easily conclude that Mallard was a well off man. The home that he lives is described as having upstairs and the furnishings are comfortable. We also see that he was coming from a journey showing that he travelled to several places. He is also in a position to hire a medical doctor who diagnoses his wife and concludes her death due to heart disease. This is an image of a wealthy man. It is rich men who bother themselves with travels and having personal doctors. There is irony in the story. According to the setting of the story the writer makes readers feel that it is going to end well. Oise will have freedom and lead the life of her choice if her husband dies. But this is not the case. The husband comes back alive and when Louise sees her she dies out of the heart disease. She does not experience the good moments that she thought she will have. When Louise is told the news about the death of her husband she goes back to her room alone and gets seated in a comfortable chair and starts staring outside. She sees the top of the trees that have new springs of life. Its ironical that she sees the death of her husband as the beginning of her new life and she is very happy about it. Instead of mourning that her husband is dead she is happy about the episode. She would now live her live in the way she wanted it to be. Other phrases are also ironical like Patches of blue skies showing through the clouds, the delicious smell of rain the air, and also the countless sparrows were twittering in the eaves are description which imply of the life that Mrs. Mallard was about to begin. As soon as she was about to begin her new life, she died. Its also ironical that Louise lived with a man who she was not happy about but still stayed with him. She is described to have loved him only sometimes and often she did not love her. It is very funny that Mallard did not know that his wife did not love him. Throughout the time that they spend together Mallard must have been in a position to see some of the things that her wife did to her and at least sense that she did not love her. It is a worry that she could not realize this from her wife. Chopin has also used foreshadowing in this story. This device is used in the beginning of the story. From the way the story begins something bad was going to happen to this lady. Somewhere in the course of the story she was likely to die of heart disease. There are also other things throughout the story which makes us understand that something will go wrong but the writer tries to make us feel that everything is going to run smoothly .Chopin ends the story in a manner which leaves us with a lot of surprise.She did not take much of her time to give out the story neither did she use a lot of materials to convey the information. As the title of the story indicates this is the story of the last hour of Mrs. Mallards life. In the process of telling us about the last moments of her life, Chopin also gives us her life history until that point.(Boren and Davis 23) The plot of the story makes the author to major on the thoughts of Mrs. Mallard. This is important in explaining the theme of the story which deals with her desire to have freedom. She wishes to fulfill her desires after her husbands death. Louse is presented in the story as somebody who is likeable and sympathetic character. The way in which her sister breaks the news of her husbands death and the way she is portrayed to have problems with her heart makes the reader to sympathize with her. The author also uses narrative as a stylistic device. The way the story is told is a narrative. Its a story of the life of Mallard and how she related with her husband. Death is used as a theme in this story. Mrs. Mallard dies at the end of the story. Her husband is shown to have been involved in an accident and he was in the list of the people who died even though he actually was not involved. The story is used to describe a woman and the way she reacts to news of her dead husband and her respons e when she realizes he is alive. She was unfaithful to her husband and therefore she deserved the death herself not the husband. Work cited Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Catherine Golden. Charlotte Perkins Gilmans the yellow wall-paper: a sourcebook and critical edition. London. Rutledge, 2004. Lynda Sue Boren and Sara de Saussure Davis. Kate Chopin reconsidered: beyond the Bayou. New York LSU Press, 1999

Clinton Administration Policy Toward The Caribbean Country Of Haiti :: William Jefferson Clinton Essays

Clinton Administration Policy Toward the Caribbean Country of Haiti The topic for this paper is the United States policy towards the Caribbean country of Haiti during the Clinton administration. The subjects which will be discussed are the issues of: Refugees, Foreign Aide as well as human rights the United States involvement in Haiti issues of national interests. What will also be examined is what the Clinton administration trying to achieve concerning Haiti. What the United Nations and the U.S. roles were, and what the public thought was concerning these issues. Also why the United States was involved with the internal dispute of a third world country where the national interest was not clearly defined. The issue of why was it or was not so important for the United States to send troops to Haiti will also be discussed. The problem in Haiti was the pro democratic elected president Aristide was exile from Haiti during a military coup. Several issues arose out of Haiti after the exile of Aristide. Issues of: human rights there were reports that the new regime brought back "death squads" killing people who opposed the new leaders. One of the main targets of the Clinton policy is a group called the Front for the Advancement and Progress of Haiti of FRAPH. The administration has targeted this group for their continued backing and support of General Cedras, for their human rights violations. Issues of , refugee's illegally trying to enter the United States creating an economic burden on much of south Florida. All of these issues arose during president Bush's term in office. The Bush administration was to turn back the refugee's. The Bush administration saw no vital national interest in concerning it self with the internal problems of Haiti ,because there were so many problems at home in the United States, other than to turn the refugee's away from south Florida. When president Clinton took over the office of the presidency he would become very indecisive and weak on the issue of Haiti. President Clinton began badly on Haiti. With his continual indecision and lack of any real back bone to the policies which were decided upon. "First, he gave charge of his policy to Bush administration holdovers who over the previous year had made clear their intent to construct in Haiti a version of democracy that left the president in exile but with an Aristide - appointed prime minister and cabinet. This tortured scenario was doomed to failure because over two thirds of the Haitian people equated democratic government with the return of Aristide and no arrangement that excluded his presence could

Catcher in the Rye Essay

Holden, the main character of the book Catcher in the Rye by J.D Salinger, had to face many conflicts during the story. These conflicts connect to him either by secondary character or by himself. Not only do this conflicts affect Holden, but if affects the people around him as well. Holden’s attitude became negative because of all the conflicts he faced. â€Å"The first thing you’ll probably ask is where I was born and how my lousy childhood was like†. During his childhood, he was alone with no close friends or family. This affected him because he felt excluded from the society. It also made him feel like he didn’t have any support so that made him go to the city by himself and get into trouble. He didn’t get any support from anyone so he wasn’t told what was wrong and what was right, that was why he smoked and drank. Also since he didn’t have a family who supported him so he never took the school seriously. He was kicked out of four schools because of his bad grades. (Evidence found in Pg. 1) â€Å"I slept in the garage the night he died, and I broke all the goddam windows with my fist, just for the hell of it†. Allies death affected him mentally. It made him very sad at the moment but after a time it made him aggressive and anti-social. (Evidence found in Chapter 5) He criticized everyone. He calls everyone a phony. Thinks other people are followers and are only tricking themselves. So he wants to rebel against the society because they’re making everyone a phony. This attitude made him see everyone in a bad way which made it very difficult for him to make friends. (Evidence found all over the book) He has a Self vs. Self battle throughout the whole book. He wants to be the same person but he doesn’t realize he’s changing. He likes the museum because it never changes. One part of him wants to be an adult (he drinks and smokes and always thinks of sex) while to other part of him rejects it rejects it as a phony. So as you can see, all these conflicts led to his bad, negative attitude. He became aggressive, rebel, and excluded. It also made him problematic and hard to understand. The conflicts implemented some psychological problems on Holden by making him increase his interest in alcohol and drugs.

Hedda Gabler Essay

In the beginning when the reader meets Hedda Gabler, one can see how she is quite a high maintenance character by how she complains that the maid has† opened the door. I’m drowning in all this sunlight. † (Ibsen 1469). Exerting her power over her husband, George Tesman, she demands him to close the curtains, which he does complacently. Later Hedda notices an old hat lying on the chair and worries that someone may have seen it. When she learns that the hat belongs to Miss Tesman, George’s dear aunt, she does not apologize for her comment which shows her tendency to belittle others, even if they are family. Hedda utters to her husband, â€Å"But where did she get her manners, flinging her hat around any way she likes here in the drawing room. People just don’t act that way. † (1418). The author depicts Hedda as a neurotic woman who criticizes the actions of others in an attempt to demonstrate her self- imposed superiority over others. Her pretentious comment introduces the theme of a high and mighty character, which readers will begin to hate, who eventually succumbs to the pressure of appearing perfect in society. In the scene where George and Hedda receive news that Mrs. Elvsted, an â€Å"old flame† of Tesman, will be visiting, Hedda remembers her as the one with â€Å"that irritating hair she’d always be fussing with† (1418). By this remark, the reader can predict that Hedda, very jealous of Mrs. Elvsted, will attempt to flaunt her superiority over her throughout the rest of the play. Once Mrs. Elvsted arrives, and she and Hedda are alone they chat about a variety of topics: marriage, love, and most importantly, a man named Eilert Lovborg, with whom Mrs. Elvsted is in love. Admitting her feelings of loneliness in her marriage, Mrs.  Elvsted strives to justify her relationship with Lovborg and mentions how happy he makes her when he allows her to help him write, as he is a published author. However, Mrs. Elvsted is unsure of the future of their relationship because â€Å"the shadow of a woman† stands between them. This unidentified woman was going to shoot Lovborg when they broke up. As Hedda learns of this, she comments, â€Å"That’s nonsense. People just don’t act that way here. † (1424). Yet, an astute reader can tell that Hedda is hiding something: she was, in fact, the woman who had previously tried to shoot Lovborg. Ibsen does this to show that Hedda acts in a manner that contradicts her snooty statements. Later in the play when Lovborg visits Hedda, he confronts her by asking why she married George because it is apparent that she does not love him. Then he inquires if she ever loved him while the two had previously been in a relationship, and he reminisced about how he confessed so many secrets to her. â€Å"Ah, Hedda, what kind of power was in you that drew these confessions out of me? † (1440) he asked. Mischievously, she responds, â€Å"You think it was a power in me? (1440). All the while, Hedda takes pleasure in knowing that she can control others by exerting her power over them. Deeper into their conversation, the reader learns that when the two enjoyed a secret friendship, Hedda had threatened to shoot Lovborg, but she did not because she feared the scandal it would have caused. Once again, Hedda proves to be overly concerned of what society thinks. On the outside, she appears to fit the mold of how a woman in society should behave; yet, internally, she struggles with a predisposition to act in a contradicting manner of what society regards as acceptable behavior. She is propelled by this internal conflict during the entire play. Earlier in the play, the reader inferred that Hedda envies Mrs. Elvsted because of her relationship with Lovborg; therefore, the reader expects to see Hedda parade her superiority over Mrs. Elvsted. True to her character, Hedda rips out the pages in Lovborg’s manuscript, which Mrs. Elvsted helped him write, and throws them into the stove. Crazed, Hedda exclaims, â€Å"I’m burning your child, Thea! You with your curly hair! Your child and Eilert Lovborg’s. I’m burning it! I’m burning your child† (Ibsen 1456). Right before this manic event, Hedda urges Lovborg to commit suicide, gives him one of her pistols, and expresses her desire for him to do it â€Å"in beauty† (1456). Once she persuades Lovborg to commit suicide, Hedda can no longer suppress her internal conflicts and shoots herself in the head. The reader can assume that Hedda commits suicide beautifully, as she hoped Lovborg would do. Her motto of â€Å"people just don’t act that way,† proves to be false because her actions are exactly what she says people do not do. Throughout Hedda Gabler, the main character possesses much contempt for her husband, insults others, and resents a former acquaintance. Despite her concern with society’s opinion of her, she feels trapped within society’s standards to act a certain way. Yet, in doing so, she becomes dejected from others and society as a whole. Repeatedly, she uses the following phrase: â€Å"People just don’t act that way,† in an attempt to suppress her internal desires to be like one of those people. By the end, Hedda cannot live torn between two different realities; she chooses to behave like one of those people, and she commits suicide- in beauty, of course.